Posts
Why Most "Leaders" Are Just Supervisors in Expensive Suits
Related Articles:
The bloke sitting across from me in the boardroom had "Senior Vice President of Leadership Development" on his business card. Twenty minutes into our meeting, he asked his assistant to bring him a coffee. Nothing wrong with that, except he didn't say please, didn't make eye contact, and went back to talking about "empowering teams" without missing a beat.
That's when it hit me. We've got this whole thing backwards.
Everyone wants to be a leader. Nobody wants to admit they're just a supervisor. But here's what seventeen years of working with companies across Brisbane, Sydney, and Melbourne has taught me: the best leaders I know started as bloody good supervisors. And most of the worst leaders never learned basic supervisor skills in the first place.
The Great Leadership Delusion
Walk into any Bunnings on a Saturday morning and watch the team leaders in action. They know where everything is, they can solve problems on the spot, and they treat customers and staff with equal respect. Compare that to some executive I worked with last month who couldn't figure out the printer but wanted to "revolutionise our innovation pipeline."
We've created this weird hierarchy where supervision is seen as entry-level and leadership is the prize. But supervision IS leadership. It's just leadership without the ego massage.
Think about it. When your toilet's blocked at 2am, you don't want a visionary leader with a strategic mindset. You want someone who knows pipes, has the right tools, and can fix the bloody thing. Same principle applies in business, except we've convinced ourselves that knowing how things actually work is somehow beneath us.
What Supervisors Know That Leaders Forget
Real supervisors understand something most senior executives don't: people aren't resources. They're people.
I learned this the hard way managing a construction crew in Darwin back in 2009. Had this brilliant strategic vision for improving productivity. Colour-coded charts, efficiency metrics, the works. Productivity dropped 23% in the first month.
Turned out, the crew was dealing with a family crisis for one of their mates. Instead of my fancy systems, they needed someone who could listen, adjust schedules, and cover shifts. Basic human supervision. Once I sorted that out, productivity jumped 31% above the original baseline.
Most leadership training skips this entirely. They teach you how to inspire and motivate, but not how to notice when someone's struggling or how to have a difficult conversation without making it worse.
The Skills Gap Nobody Talks About
Here's what gets me fired up: companies spend millions on leadership development programs that teach executives how to "think strategically" and "drive change." Meanwhile, their front-line supervisors are figuring out real problems with zero training.
I've seen supervisors handle workplace conflicts, manage budgets, coordinate complex projects, and maintain team morale during redundancies. All while being told they need to "step up to leadership level" to be taken seriously.
That's like telling a master carpenter they need to become an architect to be respected. Different skills, different roles, but both essential.
The supervisor skills that actually matter:
Real-time problem solving. Not strategic planning sessions, but fixing things when they break down at 4:30pm on Friday.
Direct communication. Saying what needs to be said without corporate speak or management jargon.
Resource management. Making things work with what you've got, not what you wish you had.
People development. Teaching skills, not just delegating tasks.
Accountability. Taking responsibility when things go wrong, not finding someone else to blame.
These aren't stepping stones to leadership. These ARE leadership skills.
The Australian Advantage
We're actually pretty good at this in Australia. Maybe it's the tall poppy syndrome, or maybe it's just that we don't have as many layers of management nonsense as other countries. But I've noticed something working with international companies: Australian supervisors tend to be more hands-on and less precious about hierarchy.
I worked with a mining company that brought in American consultants to improve their leadership structure. The consultants were horrified that site supervisors were still getting their hands dirty. "Leaders don't do operational work," they said.
Eighteen months later, after productivity dropped and safety incidents increased, they quietly went back to the old system. Turns out, supervisors who understand the work make better decisions than executives who only understand PowerPoint.
The Skills Transfer That Never Happens
Here's the real problem: we promote good supervisors out of supervision instead of teaching other leaders how to supervise.
You know Sarah from Woolworths who can handle angry customers, coordinate staff during busy periods, and spot shoplifters while maintaining perfect stock levels? She'd make a brilliant regional manager. But instead of teaching other managers her supervisory skills, we'll send her to leadership training to learn "strategic thinking."
Meanwhile, the regional manager who replaced her has never worked a retail shift and wonders why staff turnover keeps increasing.
This happens everywhere. Engineering firms promote their best technical supervisors into project management roles where they can't use their hands-on skills. Retail chains move floor supervisors into head office where they lose touch with actual customer service.
What Good Supervision Actually Looks Like
I'm working with a family-owned electrical business in Perth right now. The owner's son just finished his apprenticeship and is learning to supervise. His dad could have sent him to some expensive leadership development program, but instead, he's learning on-site.
Last month, they had a job go sideways when the client changed requirements halfway through. The young supervisor had to reorganise materials, adjust timelines, communicate with the client, and keep his crew motivated. No strategic planning session, no stakeholder analysis. Just real-time problem solving with real consequences.
That's the kind of training that builds actual leadership capability.
The Bottom Line
Stop treating supervision as a career stepping stone. Start recognising it as a leadership foundation.
The best CEOs I know can still do their old jobs. They remember what it feels like to deal with difficult customers, manage tight deadlines, and solve problems with limited resources. They haven't forgotten how to supervise because they understand that's where real leadership begins.
If you want to develop better leaders, start by developing better supervisors. Teach them the skills they need to succeed at their current level instead of constantly preparing them for the next one.
And if you're a supervisor reading this: you're already a leader. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise.
The real question isn't how to move from supervision to leadership. It's how to bring supervisory skills into every level of the organisation.
Because at the end of the day, leadership without supervision is just management without accountability. And we've got enough of that already.
Other Blogs of Interest: